Verified research, traced to peer reviewed evidence.

Veriomics grounds every methodology decision in peer reviewed evidence, from literature search to reproducible results.

PROBLEM

Literature Overload

40M+

papers in PubMed, with 1M+ added each year

(NLM, 2025)

3.8M

articles published in 2023-2024, 2x the 2003-2004 volume

(Ioannidis, JAMA 2024)

80

systematic reviews published every day worldwide

(Covvey et al., 2024)

2.9M

publications/year globally in science & engineering

(NSF, cited 2024)

PROBLEM

Methodology Guesswork

1%

of protocols use meta-analysis data for sample size planning

(Covvey et al., 2024)

18 mo

average time to complete a systematic review

(Cochrane, current)

50%

of biomedical studies have statistical power below 20%

(Royal Society Open Sci, 2024)

PROBLEM

Tool & Pipeline Failures

→ Genomic reproducibility crisis still unresolved as of 2024 (Baykal et al., Genome Biology 2024)

PROBLEM

Reproducibility Crisis

72%

of biomedical researchers agree there is a reproducibility crisis

(Cobey et al., PLOS Biol 2024)

27%

describe the crisis as "significant"

(Cobey et al., PLOS Biol 2024)

62%

"publish or perish" culture as primary cause

(Cobey et al., PLOS Biol 2024)

49%

of bioinformatics software hard to install

(Bio-IT World, 2024)

SOLUTION

Literature Discovery

0 peer-reviewed papers foundPubMed + Europe PMC · 0.4s

Bolyen et al. — Reproducible, interactive, scalable microbiome data science using QIIME 2

Nature Biotechnology, 201911,247 citations
→ Consensus: Shannon, Faith PD, and observed features used in 78% of similar studies

Callahan et al. — DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data

Nature Methods, 201619,832 citations
→ Recommended for ASV inference before diversity analysis (used in 84% of recent studies)
SOLUTION

Defensible Methodology

Without VeriomicsWith Veriomics
Sample sizePower calculation
n=10Guessed, no power calculation
n=24Calculated from 14 meta-analyses

→ ≥80% power, ES ≥ 0.5

ConfoundersVariables to control
3Age, sex, BMI only
7Auto-detected from prior studies

→ Diet, antibiotics, geography

Protocol auditPre-flight check
NoneHope it passes peer review
Cross-checkedEvery choice validated against consensus

→ Before you run a single sample

SOLUTION

Justified Workflows

RESEARCH QUESTION
Identify gut microbiome differences in IBD patients vs healthy controls

Quality control & denoising

DADA2
Removes errors, infers exact sequence variants

→ Callahan et al., Nat Methods 2016

Taxonomic classification

SILVA 138.2
Maps sequences to bacterial taxa

→ Quast et al., Nucl Acids Res 2013

Diversity analysis

QIIME 2
Compares richness between groups

→ Bolyen et al., Nat Biotech 2019

Differential abundance

ANCOM-BC2
Identifies taxa differing between groups

→ Lin & Peddada, Nat Comms 2020

Defensible workflowEvery parameter citedReproducible by design
SOLUTION

Traceable Reproducibility

Run #2476 · IBD-microbiome-studySHA:
  1. 14:23:01 · Mar 12, 2026
    Workflow plan generated

    Method choices justified by 14 papers in field consensus — full citation tree logged

  2. 14:24:47 · Mar 12, 2026
    Quality filtering completed

    DADA2 v1.30.0 · 89,432 reads filtered · parameters cited to Callahan et al. 2016

  3. 14:31:12 · Mar 12, 2026
    Results auto-compared to published benchmarks

    Shannon diversity falls within range reported in 8 similar IBD cohort studies

  4. 14:35:48 · Mar 12, 2026
    ML failure detection passed

    No data leakage detected · cross-validation integrity verified · audit trail complete

Analytical Engine

A verification engine, not a black box.

Where data, methodology, and evidence converge — every output traceable to published science.

Veriomics analytical engine: three input streams converge through a multimodal AI core into three verified output streams
INPUT 01
Raw Data
Sequencing, proteomics, single-cell
INPUT 02
Lab Context
Metadata, protocols, experimental design
INPUT 03
Published Evidence
PubMed, Europe PMC, benchmarks
Multimodal AI EnginePredictive modelling · Domain pipelines · Decision orchestrationcross-checked against the published literature
OUTPUT 01
Cited Discoveries
Every finding traced to evidence
OUTPUT 02
Predictive Models
Literature-validated approaches
OUTPUT 03
Reproducible Reports
Auto-comparison with published benchmarks
Sources

Built on sources scientists already trust

Built on PubMed and Europe PMC. Expanding to every major scientific source.

PubMed
EuropePMC
Scopus
Web ofScience
Wiley
SpringerNature
bioRxiv
medRxiv
arXiv
SemanticScholar
Cochrane
ClinicalTrials.gov
WHOICTRP
CrossRef
FAIRPrinciples
TopJournals

Literature Databases

Peer-reviewed biomedical literature — the foundation of evidence-based research.

Preprint Servers

Open early-stage research from leading preprint repositories, with full provenance.

Clinical & Evidence

Curated systematic reviews and registered clinical trials — the gold standard for clinical decision support.

Trust & Verification

Citation, identity, and quality frameworks that make every output independently verifiable.

Why Veriomics

Built for science you can defend

Three principles that shape how we build.

Augment, not replace bioinformaticians

Repetitive analysis goes to AI. Methodology, interpretation, and judgement stay with the scientist — and with the bioinformaticians who already do this work.

From months to days

Cut weeks of methodology research without cutting evidence — every accelerated decision still traced to published science.

Built by a microbiologist who codes

Bench science, peer-reviewed publications, and production data systems in industry — Veriomics is built by someone who has lived inside the workflow it's solving.

Who it's for

From a single researcher to a whole programme

Academic, biotech, and regulated teams — built for each.

Free

Free Academic

PhDs, postdocs, professors

Run literature work and explore Veriomics on your own research questions, no cost.

  • Capability 1: Research Discovery
  • Limited Workflow Planner access
  • Community support
Contact for pricing

Paid Academic

Funded university labs

For groups with grant funding who need full access for their team.

  • Full Capability 1 + 4
  • Team workspaces
  • Priority support
Contact for pricing

Small Biotech

Companies under 50 people

Augment your team's analytical capacity without requiring a full-time bioinformatics hire.

  • All capabilities as released
  • Private workspaces
  • Onboarding + dedicated support
Custom

Pharma & Enterprise

Enterprise & regulated

Audit trails, traceability, and verification built for regulated environments.

  • Full audit trail
  • Audit-ready outputs
  • SLA + procurement support
Traction

What's live. What's coming.

2025

Literature retrieval across PubMed and Europe PMC, with methodology consensus extraction.

2025

Experimental design advisor controls, sample sizing, and confounders, grounded in published precedent.

2025

Unified data ingestion sequencing, public repositories, and lab metadata in one analytical layer.

2026

Compose analytical workflows where every parameter is cited to published methodology.

TBA

Execute workflows with reproducible provenance from raw input to final output.

TBA

Publication-ready reports, every result paired with cited evidence and methodology.

TBA

Literature-validated predictive models, outputs cross-checked against published benchmarks.

TBA

Continuous validation across data, methodology, and outputs - every conclusion traceable to evidence.

TBA

Forward-looking projections that anticipate biological outcomes, experimental success rates, and research direction before resources are committed.

Run a pilot. See defensible results.

Run a focused pilot — see how Veriomics fits your actual research before committing.